<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Dr. Barry Dworkin &#187; Junk Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/category/health-headlines/junk-science-health-headlines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.drbarrydworkin.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:16:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; Dr. Barry Dworkin 2011 </copyright>
	<managingEditor>bpr@brigittepellerinrobson.com (Dr. Barry Dworkin)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>bpr@brigittepellerinrobson.com (Dr. Barry Dworkin)</webMaster>
	<ttl>1440</ttl>
	
	<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:category text="Society &#38; Culture" />
	<itunes:author>Dr. Barry Dworkin</itunes:author>
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>Dr. Barry Dworkin</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>bpr@brigittepellerinrobson.com</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/BarryLogo1.jpg" />
		<item>
		<title>Much ado about cellphone use and cancer risk signifying nothing</title>
		<link>http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2011/06/01/much-ado-about-cellphone-use-and-cancer-risk-signifying-nothing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2011/06/01/much-ado-about-cellphone-use-and-cancer-risk-signifying-nothing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Barry Dworkin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cancer/Oncology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Junk Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxicology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glioblastoma]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/?p=4474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Madely Health Headlines Commentary for June 1 , 2011



Source:

<a href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/PublicHealthPolicy/PublicHealth/26776?utm_content=&#38;utm_medium=email&#38;utm_campaign=DailyHeadlines&#38;utm_source=WC&#38;userid=64963" target="_blank">WHO Says Cell Phones May Cause Cancer</a>

Related articles:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2011/10/05/health-canadas-cellphone-use-warning-lacks-concrete-evidence/' rel='bookmark' title='Health Canada&#8217;s cellphone-use warning lacks concrete evidence'>Health Canada&#8217;s cellphone-use warning lacks concrete evidence</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2009/11/30/why-the-h1n1-vaccine-program-continues-despite-the-decline-in-infection-rates/' rel='bookmark' title='Why the H1N1 vaccine program continues despite the decline in infection rates'>Why the H1N1 vaccine program continues despite the decline in infection rates</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2010/05/17/cell-phone-link-to-brain-cancer-is-tenuous-at-best/' rel='bookmark' title='Cell phone link to brain cancer is tenuous at best'>Cell phone link to brain cancer is tenuous at best</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:right;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"></div><p>Madely Health Headlines Commentary for June 1 , 2011</p>
<p></p>
<p>Source:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/PublicHealthPolicy/PublicHealth/26776?utm_content=&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=DailyHeadlines&amp;utm_source=WC&amp;userid=64963" target="_blank">WHO Says Cell Phones May Cause Cancer</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Related articles:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2011/10/05/health-canadas-cellphone-use-warning-lacks-concrete-evidence/' rel='bookmark' title='Health Canada&#8217;s cellphone-use warning lacks concrete evidence'>Health Canada&#8217;s cellphone-use warning lacks concrete evidence</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2009/11/30/why-the-h1n1-vaccine-program-continues-despite-the-decline-in-infection-rates/' rel='bookmark' title='Why the H1N1 vaccine program continues despite the decline in infection rates'>Why the H1N1 vaccine program continues despite the decline in infection rates</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2010/05/17/cell-phone-link-to-brain-cancer-is-tenuous-at-best/' rel='bookmark' title='Cell phone link to brain cancer is tenuous at best'>Cell phone link to brain cancer is tenuous at best</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2011/06/01/much-ado-about-cellphone-use-and-cancer-risk-signifying-nothing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/audio/MHH/11/110601-cellphone-use-and-brain-cancer-scare.mp3" length="1" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>0:00:01</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Madely Health Headlines Commentary for June 1 , 2011



Source:

WHO Says Cell Phones May Cause Cancer

Related articles:
Health Canada&#8217;s cellphone-use warning lacks concrete evidence
Why the H1N1 vaccine program continues despite the d[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Madely Health Headlines Commentary for June 1 , 2011



Source:

WHO Says Cell Phones May Cause Cancer

Related articles:
Health Canada&#8217;s cellphone-use warning lacks concrete evidence
Why the H1N1 vaccine program continues despite the decline in infection rates
Cell phone link to brain cancer is tenuous at best
</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Cancer/Oncology, Toxicology</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>bpr@brigittepellerinrobson.com</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunscreen ingredient warning more chemical fearmongering</title>
		<link>http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2011/05/30/sunscreen-ingredient-warning-more-chemical-fearmongering/</link>
		<comments>http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2011/05/30/sunscreen-ingredient-warning-more-chemical-fearmongering/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 01:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Barry Dworkin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Junk Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pseudoscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxicology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunscreens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/?p=4466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Madely Health Headlines Commentary for May 30, 2011



Source:

<a href="http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/TopStories/20110527/sunscreens-dermatologists-skin-cancer-110529/" target="_blank">Dermatologists dismiss sunscreen worries</a>

Related articles:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2009/11/30/why-the-h1n1-vaccine-program-continues-despite-the-decline-in-infection-rates/' rel='bookmark' title='Why the H1N1 vaccine program continues despite the decline in infection rates'>Why the H1N1 vaccine program continues despite the decline in infection rates</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2011/06/14/study-suggests-autism-screening-has-too-many-false-positives-and-a-discussion-about-a-sunscreen-use-survey/' rel='bookmark' title='Study suggests autism screening has too many false positives and a discussion about a sunscreen use survey'>Study suggests autism screening has too many false positives and a discussion about a sunscreen use survey</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2011/09/16/dr-ozs-fearmongering-about-arsenic-in-apple-juice/' rel='bookmark' title='Dr. Oz&#8217;s fearmongering about arsenic in apple juice'>Dr. Oz&#8217;s fearmongering about arsenic in apple juice</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:right;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"></div><p>Madely Health Headlines Commentary for May 30, 2011</p>
<p></p>
<p>Source:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/TopStories/20110527/sunscreens-dermatologists-skin-cancer-110529/" target="_blank">Dermatologists dismiss sunscreen worries</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Related articles:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2009/11/30/why-the-h1n1-vaccine-program-continues-despite-the-decline-in-infection-rates/' rel='bookmark' title='Why the H1N1 vaccine program continues despite the decline in infection rates'>Why the H1N1 vaccine program continues despite the decline in infection rates</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2011/06/14/study-suggests-autism-screening-has-too-many-false-positives-and-a-discussion-about-a-sunscreen-use-survey/' rel='bookmark' title='Study suggests autism screening has too many false positives and a discussion about a sunscreen use survey'>Study suggests autism screening has too many false positives and a discussion about a sunscreen use survey</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2011/09/16/dr-ozs-fearmongering-about-arsenic-in-apple-juice/' rel='bookmark' title='Dr. Oz&#8217;s fearmongering about arsenic in apple juice'>Dr. Oz&#8217;s fearmongering about arsenic in apple juice</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2011/05/30/sunscreen-ingredient-warning-more-chemical-fearmongering/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/audio/MHH/11/110530-suncreen-ingredient-fearmongering.mp3" length="1" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>0:00:01</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Madely Health Headlines Commentary for May 30, 2011



Source:

Dermatologists dismiss sunscreen worries

Related articles:
Why the H1N1 vaccine program continues despite the decline in infection rates
Study suggests autism screening has too [...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Madely Health Headlines Commentary for May 30, 2011



Source:

Dermatologists dismiss sunscreen worries

Related articles:
Why the H1N1 vaccine program continues despite the decline in infection rates
Study suggests autism screening has too many false positives and a discussion about a sunscreen use survey
Dr. Oz&#8217;s fearmongering about arsenic in apple juice
</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Pseudoscience, Toxicology</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>bpr@brigittepellerinrobson.com</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>More chemophobia reports about heavy metals in lipstick, Mumps booster recommended for young adults</title>
		<link>http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2011/05/17/more-chemophobia-reports-about-heavy-metals-in-lipstick-mumps-booster-recommended-for-young-adults/</link>
		<comments>http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2011/05/17/more-chemophobia-reports-about-heavy-metals-in-lipstick-mumps-booster-recommended-for-young-adults/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 11:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Barry Dworkin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infectious Disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Junk Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Media Reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vaccines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/?p=4414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Madely Health Headlines Commentary for May 17, 2011



Source:
<a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/health/new-health/health-news/how-safe-is-your-makeup/article2023975/">How safe is your makeup? </a>

<a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/health/new-health/health-news/teens-and-young-adults-may-need-mumps-booster/article2023927/">Teens and young adults may need mumps booster</a>

Reference:

<a href="http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/content/abstract/cmaj.101371v1" target="_blank">An assessment of mumps vaccine effectiveness by dose during an outbreak in Canada</a>
Related articles:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2007/04/15/exceededing-our-recommended-daily-salt-limits/' rel='bookmark' title='Exceeding our recommended daily salt limits'>Exceeding our recommended daily salt limits</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2007/02/04/teen-cancer-survival-rates-dismal-when-compared-to-those-for-youngsters-and-older-adults-with-the-disease/' rel='bookmark' title='Teen cancer survival rates dismal when compared to those for youngsters and older adults with the disease'>Teen cancer survival rates dismal when compared to those for youngsters and older adults with the disease</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2011/09/06/two-doses-of-chicken-pox-vaccine-recommended/' rel='bookmark' title='Two doses of chicken pox vaccine recommended'>Two doses of chicken pox vaccine recommended</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:right;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"></div><p>Madely Health Headlines Commentary for May 17, 2011</p>
<p></p>
<p>Source:<br />
<a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/health/new-health/health-news/how-safe-is-your-makeup/article2023975/">How safe is your makeup? </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/health/new-health/health-news/teens-and-young-adults-may-need-mumps-booster/article2023927/">Teens and young adults may need mumps booster</a></p>
<p>Reference:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/content/abstract/cmaj.101371v1" target="_blank">An assessment of mumps vaccine effectiveness by dose during an outbreak in Canada</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Related articles:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2007/04/15/exceededing-our-recommended-daily-salt-limits/' rel='bookmark' title='Exceeding our recommended daily salt limits'>Exceeding our recommended daily salt limits</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2007/02/04/teen-cancer-survival-rates-dismal-when-compared-to-those-for-youngsters-and-older-adults-with-the-disease/' rel='bookmark' title='Teen cancer survival rates dismal when compared to those for youngsters and older adults with the disease'>Teen cancer survival rates dismal when compared to those for youngsters and older adults with the disease</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2011/09/06/two-doses-of-chicken-pox-vaccine-recommended/' rel='bookmark' title='Two doses of chicken pox vaccine recommended'>Two doses of chicken pox vaccine recommended</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2011/05/17/more-chemophobia-reports-about-heavy-metals-in-lipstick-mumps-booster-recommended-for-young-adults/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/audio/MHH/11/110517-chemophobia-and-mumps-booster.mp3" length="1" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>0:00:01</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Madely Health Headlines Commentary for May 17, 2011



Source:
How safe is your makeup? 

Teens and young adults may need mumps booster

Reference:

An assessment of mumps vaccine effectiveness by dose during an outbreak in Canada
Related[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Madely Health Headlines Commentary for May 17, 2011



Source:
How safe is your makeup? 

Teens and young adults may need mumps booster

Reference:

An assessment of mumps vaccine effectiveness by dose during an outbreak in Canada
Related articles:
Exceeding our recommended daily salt limits
Teen cancer survival rates dismal when compared to those for youngsters and older adults with the disease
Two doses of chicken pox vaccine recommended
</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Vaccines</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>bpr@brigittepellerinrobson.com</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>MMR/autism paper fully retracted by the Lancet</title>
		<link>http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2010/02/03/mmrautism-paper-fully-retracted-by-the-lancet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2010/02/03/mmrautism-paper-fully-retracted-by-the-lancet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Barry Dworkin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Junk Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Media Reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vaccines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-vaccination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/?p=2943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Madely Health Headlines Commentary for February 3, 2010



Comment:

This is a story that we have covered extensively over the years on Sunday House Call. An excellent synopsis can be heard in our interview with Guardian columnist Dr. Ben Goldacre <a href="http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/category/book-reviews-articles/debunking-pseudoscience/">here</a>.

I hold the some of the media just as responsible as Dr. Wakefield for this fiasco by sensationalizing news, promoting fear, and misrepresenting risk to peddle their stories. They are thus <a href="http://www.badscience.net/2010/01/the-wakefield-mmr-verdict/">complicit</a> in this <a href="http://www.badscience.net/2008/08/the-medias-mmr-hoax/">MMR hoax</a>. To see them react with such gusto against Wakefield and his research now that this paper has been completely retracted from publication epitomizes hypocrisy. They have learned nothing from their shameless behaviour and poor science reporting.

Source:

<a href="http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20100202/vaccine_100202/20100202?hub=Health">Lancet  retracts study linking vaccine to autism</a>

Reference:

<strong>The Lancet,  Early Online Publication, 2 February 2010</strong>
<div>
<div>

<strong>Retraction—Ileal-lymphoid-nodular  hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder  in children</strong>
<div>
<div id="authorList">Original Text</div>
<a onclick="javascript:getListOfAuthorArticles('The Lancet',' The Editors  of The Lancet');return false;" href="http://www.thelancet.com/search/results?fieldName=Authors&#38;searchTerm=%20The%20Editors%20of%20The%20Lancet">The Editors of The Lancet</a> <a name="back-aff1" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2810%2960175-7/fulltext#aff1">a</a>

</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<blockquote>
<div>Following the  judgment of the UK General Medical Council's Fitness to Practise Panel  on Jan 28, 2010, it has become clear that several elements of the 1998  paper by Wakefield et al<a name="back-bib1" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2810%2960175-7/fulltext#bib1">1</a> are incorrect, contrary to the findings of an earlier investigation.<a name="back-bib2" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2810%2960175-7/fulltext#bib2">2</a> In particular, the claims in the original paper that children were  "consecutively referred" and that investigations were "approved" by the  local ethics committee have been proven to be false. Therefore we fully  retract this paper from the published record.</div></blockquote>
</div>
</div>
<div id="References">
<h2>References</h2>
<div id="bib1"><a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2810%2960175-7/fulltext#back-bib1">1</a> Wakefield AJ, Murch SH, Anthony A, et al. Ileal-lymphoid-nodular  hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder  in children. Lancet 1998; 351:  637-641. <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2897%2911096-0/abstract"> Summary</a> &#124; <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2897%2911096-0/fulltext"> Full Text</a> &#124; <a onclick="return  callUnica('articletitle=ileallymphoidnodular+hyperplasia+nonspecific+colitis+and+pervasive+developmental+disorder+in+children')" href="http://download.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140673697110960.pdf?id=3d35b1b5aa0ec416:-354faaf0:12693b8794f:-76361265199026814" target="_blank"> PDF(758KB)</a> &#124; <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2897%2911096-0/fulltext" target="_blank">CrossRef</a> &#124; <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=pubmed&#38;cmd=Search&#38;term=Lancet[Jour]+AND+351[Volume]+AND+637[page]" target="_blank">PubMed</a></div>
<div id="bib2"><a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2810%2960175-7/fulltext#back-bib2">2</a> Hodgson H. A statement by The  Royal Free and University College Medical School and The Royal Free  Hampstead NHS Trust. Lancet 2004; 363:  824. <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2804%2915711-5/fulltext"> Full Text</a> &#124; <a onclick="return  callUnica('articletitle=a+statement+by+the+royal+free+and+university+college+medical+school+and+the+royal+free+hampstead+nhs+trust')" href="http://download.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140673604157115.pdf?id=3d35b1b5aa0ec416:-354faaf0:12693b8794f:-76361265199026814" target="_blank"> PDF(37KB)</a> &#124; <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2804%2915711-5/fulltext" target="_blank">CrossRef</a> &#124; <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=pubmed&#38;cmd=Search&#38;term=Lancet[Jour]+AND+363[Volume]+AND+824[page]" target="_blank">PubMed</a></div>
</div>
<div>
<div id="aff1"><a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2810%2960175-7/fulltext#back-aff1">a</a> The Lancet, London NW1 7BY, UK</div>
</div>
</div>
Related articles:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2009/11/28/experimenting-on-children-who-have-autism/' rel='bookmark' title='Experimenting on children who have autism'>Experimenting on children who have autism</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2010/04/28/colon-cancer-screening-with-sigmoidoscopy-shown-to-be-effective-lancet-published-study/' rel='bookmark' title='Colon cancer screening with sigmoidoscopy shown to be effective: Lancet-published study'>Colon cancer screening with sigmoidoscopy shown to be effective: Lancet-published study</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2011/01/06/the-mmr-autism-hoax-bolstered-by-revelations-of-fraudulent-data/' rel='bookmark' title='The MMR-autism hoax bolstered by revelations of fraudulent data'>The MMR-autism hoax bolstered by revelations of fraudulent data</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:right;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"></div><p>Madely Health Headlines Commentary for February 3, 2010</p>
<p></p>
<p>Comment:</p>
<p>This is a story that we have covered extensively over the years on Sunday House Call. An excellent synopsis can be heard in our interview with Guardian columnist Dr. Ben Goldacre <a href="http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/category/book-reviews-articles/debunking-pseudoscience/">here</a>.</p>
<p>I hold the some of the media just as responsible as Dr. Wakefield for this fiasco by sensationalizing news, promoting fear, and misrepresenting risk to peddle their stories. They are thus <a href="http://www.badscience.net/2010/01/the-wakefield-mmr-verdict/">complicit</a> in this <a href="http://www.badscience.net/2008/08/the-medias-mmr-hoax/">MMR hoax</a>. To see them react with such gusto against Wakefield and his research now that this paper has been completely retracted from publication epitomizes hypocrisy. They have learned nothing from their shameless behaviour and poor science reporting.</p>
<p>Source:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20100202/vaccine_100202/20100202?hub=Health">Lancet  retracts study linking vaccine to autism</a></p>
<p>Reference:</p>
<p><strong>The Lancet,  Early Online Publication, 2 February 2010</strong></p>
<div>
<div>
<p><strong>Retraction—Ileal-lymphoid-nodular  hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder  in children</strong></p>
<div>
<div id="authorList">Original Text</div>
<p><a onclick="javascript:getListOfAuthorArticles('The Lancet',' The Editors  of The Lancet');return false;" href="http://www.thelancet.com/search/results?fieldName=Authors&amp;searchTerm=%20The%20Editors%20of%20The%20Lancet">The Editors of The Lancet</a> <a name="back-aff1" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2810%2960175-7/fulltext#aff1">a</a></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<blockquote>
<div>Following the  judgment of the UK General Medical Council&#8217;s Fitness to Practise Panel  on Jan 28, 2010, it has become clear that several elements of the 1998  paper by Wakefield et al<a name="back-bib1" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2810%2960175-7/fulltext#bib1">1</a> are incorrect, contrary to the findings of an earlier investigation.<a name="back-bib2" href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2810%2960175-7/fulltext#bib2">2</a> In particular, the claims in the original paper that children were  &#8220;consecutively referred&#8221; and that investigations were &#8220;approved&#8221; by the  local ethics committee have been proven to be false. Therefore we fully  retract this paper from the published record.</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
<div id="References">
<h2>References</h2>
<div id="bib1"><a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2810%2960175-7/fulltext#back-bib1">1</a> Wakefield AJ, Murch SH, Anthony A, et al. Ileal-lymphoid-nodular  hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder  in children. Lancet 1998; 351:  637-641. <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2897%2911096-0/abstract"> Summary</a> | <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2897%2911096-0/fulltext"> Full Text</a> | <a onclick="return  callUnica('articletitle=ileallymphoidnodular+hyperplasia+nonspecific+colitis+and+pervasive+developmental+disorder+in+children')" href="http://download.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140673697110960.pdf?id=3d35b1b5aa0ec416:-354faaf0:12693b8794f:-76361265199026814" target="_blank"> PDF(758KB)</a> | <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2897%2911096-0/fulltext" target="_blank">CrossRef</a> | <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=pubmed&amp;cmd=Search&amp;term=Lancet[Jour]+AND+351[Volume]+AND+637[page]" target="_blank">PubMed</a></div>
<div id="bib2"><a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2810%2960175-7/fulltext#back-bib2">2</a> Hodgson H. A statement by The  Royal Free and University College Medical School and The Royal Free  Hampstead NHS Trust. Lancet 2004; 363:  824. <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2804%2915711-5/fulltext"> Full Text</a> | <a onclick="return  callUnica('articletitle=a+statement+by+the+royal+free+and+university+college+medical+school+and+the+royal+free+hampstead+nhs+trust')" href="http://download.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140673604157115.pdf?id=3d35b1b5aa0ec416:-354faaf0:12693b8794f:-76361265199026814" target="_blank"> PDF(37KB)</a> | <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2804%2915711-5/fulltext" target="_blank">CrossRef</a> | <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=pubmed&amp;cmd=Search&amp;term=Lancet[Jour]+AND+363[Volume]+AND+824[page]" target="_blank">PubMed</a></div>
</div>
<div>
<div id="aff1"><a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2810%2960175-7/fulltext#back-aff1">a</a> The Lancet, London NW1 7BY, UK</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>Related articles:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2009/11/28/experimenting-on-children-who-have-autism/' rel='bookmark' title='Experimenting on children who have autism'>Experimenting on children who have autism</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2010/04/28/colon-cancer-screening-with-sigmoidoscopy-shown-to-be-effective-lancet-published-study/' rel='bookmark' title='Colon cancer screening with sigmoidoscopy shown to be effective: Lancet-published study'>Colon cancer screening with sigmoidoscopy shown to be effective: Lancet-published study</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2011/01/06/the-mmr-autism-hoax-bolstered-by-revelations-of-fraudulent-data/' rel='bookmark' title='The MMR-autism hoax bolstered by revelations of fraudulent data'>The MMR-autism hoax bolstered by revelations of fraudulent data</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2010/02/03/mmrautism-paper-fully-retracted-by-the-lancet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/audio/MHH/10/100203-Lancet-retracts-MMR-and-autism-research-paper.mp3" length="1" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>0:00:01</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Madely Health Headlines Commentary for February 3, 2010



Comment:

This is a story that we have covered extensively over the years on Sunday House Call. An excellent synopsis can be heard in our interview with Guardian columnist Dr. Ben Gold[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Madely Health Headlines Commentary for February 3, 2010



Comment:

This is a story that we have covered extensively over the years on Sunday House Call. An excellent synopsis can be heard in our interview with Guardian columnist Dr. Ben Goldacre here.

I hold the some of the media just as responsible as Dr. Wakefield for this fiasco by sensationalizing news, promoting fear, and misrepresenting risk to peddle their stories. They are thus complicit in this MMR hoax. To see them react with such gusto against Wakefield and his research now that this paper has been completely retracted from publication epitomizes hypocrisy. They have learned nothing from their shameless behaviour and poor science reporting.

Source:

Lancet  retracts study linking vaccine to autism

Reference:

The Lancet,  Early Online Publication, 2 February 2010



Retraction—Ileal-lymphoid-nodular  hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder  in children

Original Text
The Editors of The Lancet a






Following the  judgment of the UK General Medical Council's Fitness to Practise Panel  on Jan 28, 2010, it has become clear that several elements of the 1998  paper by Wakefield et al1 are incorrect, contrary to the findings of an earlier investigation.2 In particular, the claims in the original paper that children were  "consecutively referred" and that investigations were "approved" by the  local ethics committee have been proven to be false. Therefore we fully  retract this paper from the published record.



References
1 Wakefield AJ, Murch SH, Anthony A, et al. Ileal-lymphoid-nodular  hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder  in children. Lancet 1998; 351:  637-641.  Summary &#124;  Full Text &#124;  PDF(758KB) &#124; CrossRef &#124; PubMed
2 Hodgson H. A statement by The  Royal Free and University College Medical School and The Royal Free  Hampstead NHS Trust. Lancet 2004; 363:  824.  Full Text &#124;  PDF(37KB) &#124; CrossRef &#124; PubMed


a The Lancet, London NW1 7BY, UK


Related articles:
Experimenting on children who have autism
Colon cancer screening with sigmoidoscopy shown to be effective: Lancet-published study
The MMR-autism hoax bolstered by revelations of fraudulent data
</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Vaccines</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>bpr@brigittepellerinrobson.com</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where is the evidence to support nut-free buffer zones on airplanes?</title>
		<link>http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2010/01/08/what-is-th-eevidence-the-nut-fre-zones-on-plane-will-reduce-anaphylaxis-risk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2010/01/08/what-is-th-eevidence-the-nut-fre-zones-on-plane-will-reduce-anaphylaxis-risk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 20:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Barry Dworkin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Allergy/Immunology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Junk Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anaphylaxis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buffer zones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nut allergies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nut-free zones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[precautionary principle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/?p=2832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Madely Health Headlines Commentary for January 8, 2010



Source:

<a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=2417476" target="_blank">Air Canada ordered to create nut-free buffer zones</a>

Comment:

This is a classic illustration of poor risk evaluation. There is no information available in this article to help me answer the basic questions when examining a health claim.

How many people suffer anaphylactic reactions on airplanes that require emergency treatment? How many have died? What is the incidence of these occurrences?

Has there been any evidence to show what the risk reduction would be with setting this policy? Will there be any subsequent evaluation to look at outcomes? And if the outcome demonstrates little to no reduction of risk or incidence, will there be a push to rescind this edict?

Have proactive measures by people who have nut allergies prior to boarding the plane been sufficient to prevent anaphylaxis?

This is a classic illustration of the precautionary principle eloquently <a href="http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2008/04/20/risk-the-science-and-politics-of-fear/" target="_blank">discussed by this man</a>.

An exerpt from the website <a href="http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/peanutty-thoughts-for-today.html" target="_blank">Junkfood Science</a> illustrates this point.
<blockquote>Food allergy deaths have only been tracked by the CDC since 1998, using death certificates coded using ICD-10 classifications (the 10<sup>th</sup> edition of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases). ICD-10 hasn’t yet been universally adopted, which makes the accuracy of its figure unreliable. It reports that of 2.5 million deaths among all ages in the U.S. in 2005, 11 people died from a food allergy in 2005, with the number from peanuts unknown.

Perhaps the most accurate population data on peanut-related deaths among children comes from the UK. Its national death statistics and pediatric surveillance system has recorded death statistics for nearly all children and it <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/1888025.stm">reported</a> that only one child, a 15-year old, died from a peanut allergy between 1990 and 2000.</blockquote>
Related articles:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2010/01/11/do-nut-free-zones-on-airplanes-make-sense-to-you/' rel='bookmark' title='Do nut-free zones on airplanes make sense to you?'>Do nut-free zones on airplanes make sense to you?</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2007/12/02/is-there-evidence-to-support-antibiotic-use-in-conjunction-with-draining-the-abscess/' rel='bookmark' title='Is there evidence to support antibiotic use in conjunction with draining the abscess?'>Is there evidence to support antibiotic use in conjunction with draining the abscess?</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2008/06/29/basic-life-support-for-major-traumatic-injuries-by-paramedics-works-as-well-as-advanced-life-support/' rel='bookmark' title='Basic Life Support for major traumatic injuries by paramedics works as well as Advanced Life Support'>Basic Life Support for major traumatic injuries by paramedics works as well as Advanced Life Support</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:right;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"></div><p>Madely Health Headlines Commentary for January 8, 2010</p>
<p></p>
<p>Source:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=2417476" target="_blank">Air Canada ordered to create nut-free buffer zones</a></p>
<p>Comment:</p>
<p>This is a classic illustration of poor risk evaluation. There is no information available in this article to help me answer the basic questions when examining a health claim.</p>
<p>How many people suffer anaphylactic reactions on airplanes that require emergency treatment? How many have died? What is the incidence of these occurrences?</p>
<p>Has there been any evidence to show what the risk reduction would be with setting this policy? Will there be any subsequent evaluation to look at outcomes? And if the outcome demonstrates little to no reduction of risk or incidence, will there be a push to rescind this edict?</p>
<p>Have proactive measures by people who have nut allergies prior to boarding the plane been sufficient to prevent anaphylaxis?</p>
<p>This is a classic illustration of the precautionary principle eloquently <a href="http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2008/04/20/risk-the-science-and-politics-of-fear/" target="_blank">discussed by this man</a>.</p>
<p>An exerpt from the website <a href="http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/peanutty-thoughts-for-today.html" target="_blank">Junkfood Science</a> illustrates this point.</p>
<blockquote><p>Food allergy deaths have only been tracked by the CDC since 1998, using death certificates coded using ICD-10 classifications (the 10<sup>th</sup> edition of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases). ICD-10 hasn’t yet been universally adopted, which makes the accuracy of its figure unreliable. It reports that of 2.5 million deaths among all ages in the U.S. in 2005, 11 people died from a food allergy in 2005, with the number from peanuts unknown.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most accurate population data on peanut-related deaths among children comes from the UK. Its national death statistics and pediatric surveillance system has recorded death statistics for nearly all children and it <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/1888025.stm">reported</a> that only one child, a 15-year old, died from a peanut allergy between 1990 and 2000.</p></blockquote>
<p>Related articles:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2010/01/11/do-nut-free-zones-on-airplanes-make-sense-to-you/' rel='bookmark' title='Do nut-free zones on airplanes make sense to you?'>Do nut-free zones on airplanes make sense to you?</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2007/12/02/is-there-evidence-to-support-antibiotic-use-in-conjunction-with-draining-the-abscess/' rel='bookmark' title='Is there evidence to support antibiotic use in conjunction with draining the abscess?'>Is there evidence to support antibiotic use in conjunction with draining the abscess?</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2008/06/29/basic-life-support-for-major-traumatic-injuries-by-paramedics-works-as-well-as-advanced-life-support/' rel='bookmark' title='Basic Life Support for major traumatic injuries by paramedics works as well as Advanced Life Support'>Basic Life Support for major traumatic injuries by paramedics works as well as Advanced Life Support</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2010/01/08/what-is-th-eevidence-the-nut-fre-zones-on-plane-will-reduce-anaphylaxis-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/audio/MHH/10/100108-peanuts-on-planes.mp3" length="1" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>0:00:01</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Madely Health Headlines Commentary for January 8, 2010



Source:

Air Canada ordered to create nut-free buffer zones

Comment:

This is a classic illustration of poor risk evaluation. There is no information available in this article to h[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Madely Health Headlines Commentary for January 8, 2010



Source:

Air Canada ordered to create nut-free buffer zones

Comment:

This is a classic illustration of poor risk evaluation. There is no information available in this article to help me answer the basic questions when examining a health claim.

How many people suffer anaphylactic reactions on airplanes that require emergency treatment? How many have died? What is the incidence of these occurrences?

Has there been any evidence to show what the risk reduction would be with setting this policy? Will there be any subsequent evaluation to look at outcomes? And if the outcome demonstrates little to no reduction of risk or incidence, will there be a push to rescind this edict?

Have proactive measures by people who have nut allergies prior to boarding the plane been sufficient to prevent anaphylaxis?

This is a classic illustration of the precautionary principle eloquently discussed by this man.

An exerpt from the website Junkfood Science illustrates this point.
Food allergy deaths have only been tracked by the CDC since 1998, using death certificates coded using ICD-10 classifications (the 10th edition of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases). ICD-10 hasn’t yet been universally adopted, which makes the accuracy of its figure unreliable. It reports that of 2.5 million deaths among all ages in the U.S. in 2005, 11 people died from a food allergy in 2005, with the number from peanuts unknown.

Perhaps the most accurate population data on peanut-related deaths among children comes from the UK. Its national death statistics and pediatric surveillance system has recorded death statistics for nearly all children and it reported that only one child, a 15-year old, died from a peanut allergy between 1990 and 2000.
Related articles:
Do nut-free zones on airplanes make sense to you?
Is there evidence to support antibiotic use in conjunction with draining the abscess?
Basic Life Support for major traumatic injuries by paramedics works as well as Advanced Life Support
</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Allergy/Immunology</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>bpr@brigittepellerinrobson.com</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Diet Soda May Hurt Kidneys: not with this study</title>
		<link>http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2009/11/04/2096/</link>
		<comments>http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2009/11/04/2096/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Barry Dworkin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Junk Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nephrology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diet soda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kidney disease]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/?p=2096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Madely Health Headlines Commentary for November 4, 2009



<p align="left"></p>

Source:

<p align="left"></p>

<a href="http://www.webmd.com/diet/news/20091102/diet-sodas-hard-on-the-kidneys?page=2" target="_blank">Diet sodas may be hard on the kidneys</a>
Related articles:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2011/02/11/diet-soda-study-cannot-link-consumption-with-cardiovascular-risk/' rel='bookmark' title='Diet soda study cannot link consumption with cardiovascular risk'>Diet soda study cannot link consumption with cardiovascular risk</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2010/05/20/citric-acid-in-diet-sodas-may-thwart-kidney-stone-development/' rel='bookmark' title='Citric acid in diet sodas may thwart kidney stone development'>Citric acid in diet sodas may thwart kidney stone development</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2011/04/13/the-hcg-diet-starvation-by-any-other-name/' rel='bookmark' title='The hcG diet; starvation by any other name'>The hcG diet; starvation by any other name</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:right;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"></div><p>Madely Health Headlines Commentary for November 4, 2009</p>
<p></p>
<p align="left">
<p>Source:</p>
<p align="left">
<p><a href="http://www.webmd.com/diet/news/20091102/diet-sodas-hard-on-the-kidneys?page=2" target="_blank">Diet sodas may be hard on the kidneys</a></p>
<p>Comment:</p>
<p>The principle causes of kidney disease are high blood pressure and diabetes by far. Until a double blinded study is done with measured quantities of diet soda and proper control groups, no association or link can be made.</p>
<p>Related articles:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2011/02/11/diet-soda-study-cannot-link-consumption-with-cardiovascular-risk/' rel='bookmark' title='Diet soda study cannot link consumption with cardiovascular risk'>Diet soda study cannot link consumption with cardiovascular risk</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2010/05/20/citric-acid-in-diet-sodas-may-thwart-kidney-stone-development/' rel='bookmark' title='Citric acid in diet sodas may thwart kidney stone development'>Citric acid in diet sodas may thwart kidney stone development</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2011/04/13/the-hcg-diet-starvation-by-any-other-name/' rel='bookmark' title='The hcG diet; starvation by any other name'>The hcG diet; starvation by any other name</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2009/11/04/2096/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/audio/MHH/09/091104-diet-sodas-kidneys.mp3" length="1" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>0:00:01</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Madely Health Headlines Commentary for November 4, 2009





Source:



Diet sodas may be hard on the kidneys
Related articles:
Diet soda study cannot link consumption with cardiovascular risk
Citric acid in diet sodas may thwart kidney st[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Madely Health Headlines Commentary for November 4, 2009





Source:



Diet sodas may be hard on the kidneys
Related articles:
Diet soda study cannot link consumption with cardiovascular risk
Citric acid in diet sodas may thwart kidney stone development
The hcG diet; starvation by any other name
</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Nephrology</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>bpr@brigittepellerinrobson.com</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

