<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Dr. Barry Dworkin &#187; Debunking Pseudoscience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/category/book-reviews-articles/debunking-pseudoscience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.drbarrydworkin.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:20:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; Dr. Barry Dworkin 2011 </copyright>
	<managingEditor>bpr@brigittepellerinrobson.com (Dr. Barry Dworkin)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>bpr@brigittepellerinrobson.com (Dr. Barry Dworkin)</webMaster>
	<ttl>1440</ttl>
	
	<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:category text="Society &#38; Culture" />
	<itunes:author>Dr. Barry Dworkin</itunes:author>
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>Dr. Barry Dworkin</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>bpr@brigittepellerinrobson.com</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/BarryLogo1.jpg" />
		<item>
		<title>Bad Science</title>
		<link>http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2009/03/29/bad-science/</link>
		<comments>http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2009/03/29/bad-science/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 03:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Barry Dworkin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alternative Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debunking Pseudoscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History of Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nutrition and diet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nutrition Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmacology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prevention and Screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pseudoscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxicology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vaccine research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vaccines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-vaccination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miracle cures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMR hoax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quackery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/?p=1140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Original broadcast date: March 29, 2009 If there is one quote that epitomizes the plethora of ideas expressed in physician and Guardian columnist Dr. Ben Goldacre’s book bad science, it is this from paleontologist, evolutionary biologist, and historian of science, Steven Jay Gould: “ When people learn no tools of judgment and merely follow their [...]
Related articles:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2008/04/20/risk-the-science-and-politics-of-fear/' rel='bookmark' title='Risk: The Science and Politics of Fear'>Risk: The Science and Politics of Fear</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2007/07/15/in-bad-taste-the-adventures-and-science-behind-food-delicacies/' rel='bookmark' title='In Bad Taste? The Adventures and Science Behind Food Delicacies'>In Bad Taste? The Adventures and Science Behind Food Delicacies</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2009/11/22/the-doctor-will-sue-you-now/' rel='bookmark' title='The Doctor Will Sue You Now'>The Doctor Will Sue You Now</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:right;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"></div><p><em>Original broadcast date: March 29, 2009</em></p>
<p>If there is one quote that epitomizes the plethora of ideas expressed in physician and Guardian columnist Dr. Ben Goldacre’s book <em>bad science</em>, it is this from paleontologist, evolutionary biologist, and historian of science, Steven Jay Gould: “ When people learn no tools of judgment and merely follow their hopes, the seeds of political manipulation are sown”.</p>
<p>I have talked at length about this book and how well it encapsulates the problems we face today with respect to science reporting, how clinical studies are conducted, the vested interests and machinations that promote treatments, cures, and modes of teaching and thinking. No industry, university or political party is immune to the lack of critical appraisal of claims and research that have sown the seeds of manipulation.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.badscience.net/about-dr-ben-goldacre/">Dr. Ben Goldacre</a>, physician, award-winning writer, and broadcaster, who has written the weekly <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/series/badscience">Bad Science column</a> in the Guardian since 2003 and is author of the <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Bad-Science-Ben-Goldacre/dp/000728487X/?tag=bs0b-21">book</a> of the same name.</li>
</ul>
<p></p>
<p>Related articles:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2008/04/20/risk-the-science-and-politics-of-fear/' rel='bookmark' title='Risk: The Science and Politics of Fear'>Risk: The Science and Politics of Fear</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2007/07/15/in-bad-taste-the-adventures-and-science-behind-food-delicacies/' rel='bookmark' title='In Bad Taste? The Adventures and Science Behind Food Delicacies'>In Bad Taste? The Adventures and Science Behind Food Delicacies</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2009/11/22/the-doctor-will-sue-you-now/' rel='bookmark' title='The Doctor Will Sue You Now'>The Doctor Will Sue You Now</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2009/03/29/bad-science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/audio/SHC/09/090329-Ben-Goldacre-Part-1.mp3" length="1" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>0:00:01</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Original broadcast date: March 29, 2009
If there is one quote that epitomizes the plethora of ideas expressed in physician and Guardian columnist Dr. Ben Goldacre’s book bad science, it is this from paleontologist, evolutionary biologist, and histor[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Original broadcast date: March 29, 2009
If there is one quote that epitomizes the plethora of ideas expressed in physician and Guardian columnist Dr. Ben Goldacre’s book bad science, it is this from paleontologist, evolutionary biologist, and historian of science, Steven Jay Gould: “ When people learn no tools of judgment and merely follow their hopes, the seeds of political manipulation are sown”.
I have talked at length about this book and how well it encapsulates the problems we face today with respect to science reporting, how clinical studies are conducted, the vested interests and machinations that promote treatments, cures, and modes of teaching and thinking. No industry, university or political party is immune to the lack of critical appraisal of claims and research that have sown the seeds of manipulation.

Dr. Ben Goldacre, physician, award-winning writer, and broadcaster, who has written the weekly Bad Science column in the Guardian since 2003 and is author of the book of the same name.


Related articles:
Risk: The Science and Politics of Fear
In Bad Taste? The Adventures and Science Behind Food Delicacies
The Doctor Will Sue You Now

Related articles:
Risk: The Science and Politics of Fear
In Bad Taste? The Adventures and Science Behind Food Delicacies
The Doctor Will Sue You Now
</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Food, Pharmacology, Pseudoscience, Psychology, Science, Technology, Toxicology, Vaccines</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>bpr@brigittepellerinrobson.com</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snake Oil Science: The Truth about Complementary and Alternative Medicine</title>
		<link>http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2008/05/18/snake-oil-science-the-truth-about-complementary-and-alternative-medicine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2008/05/18/snake-oil-science-the-truth-about-complementary-and-alternative-medicine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 04:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Barry Dworkin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alternative Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debunking Pseudoscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Junk Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pseudoscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accupuncture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[placebo effect]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/?p=1462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every year millions of people flock to complementary and alternative therapists offering a vast array of treatments ranging from acupuncture to biofeedback to urine injections. Millions more purchase over-the-counter alternative medications, such as glucosamine, herbs, and homeopathic remedies. While consumer motivations for turning to complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) vary, there is one common element [...]
Related articles:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2007/05/27/complementary-and-alternative-medicine-in-canada-trends-in-use-and-public-attitudes-1997-2006/' rel='bookmark' title='Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Canada: Trends in Use and Public Attitudes, 1997-2006'>Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Canada: Trends in Use and Public Attitudes, 1997-2006</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2008/04/20/risk-the-science-and-politics-of-fear/' rel='bookmark' title='Risk: The Science and Politics of Fear'>Risk: The Science and Politics of Fear</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2009/07/05/the-oprahfication-of-medicine/' rel='bookmark' title='The &#8220;Oprah&#8221;fication of Medicine'>The &#8220;Oprah&#8221;fication of Medicine</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:right;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"></div><p class="a0 s0"><span class="f0">Every year millions of people flock to  complementary and alternative therapists offering a vast array of treatments  ranging from acupuncture to biofeedback to urine injections. Millions more  purchase over-the-counter alternative medications, such as glucosamine, herbs,  and homeopathic remedies. While consumer motivations for turning to  complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) vary, there is one common element  among them all: a belief in their effectiveness. This belief appears to be  prevalent among all elements of society, from scientists and physicians to  celebrities such as Prince Charles and Oprah Winfrey to clerical workers and  senior citizens.<br />
</span></p>
<p class="a0 s0"><span class="f0">On Sunday House Call we focus on the scientific  evidence to help us understand whether a treatment claim, be it for medications  or alternative therapies, do what they purport. And if they do, what is the true  mechanism of action behind it?<br />
</span></p>
<ul>
<li class="a0 s0"><span class="f0">Barker Bausell, PhD, biostatistician and  author, Senior Research Methodologist in the Office of Research and Professor,  University of Maryland, Baltimore. He was Research Director of a National  Institutes of Health-funded Complimentary and Alternative Medicine Specialized  Research Center.</span><span class="f0">
<p></span><span class="f0">Author of <em>Snake Oil Science: The Truth about Complementary and Alternative Medicine</em>, <em>the  science of complementary and alternative medicine</em>.</span></li>
</ul>
<p></p>
<p>Related articles:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2007/05/27/complementary-and-alternative-medicine-in-canada-trends-in-use-and-public-attitudes-1997-2006/' rel='bookmark' title='Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Canada: Trends in Use and Public Attitudes, 1997-2006'>Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Canada: Trends in Use and Public Attitudes, 1997-2006</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2008/04/20/risk-the-science-and-politics-of-fear/' rel='bookmark' title='Risk: The Science and Politics of Fear'>Risk: The Science and Politics of Fear</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2009/07/05/the-oprahfication-of-medicine/' rel='bookmark' title='The &#8220;Oprah&#8221;fication of Medicine'>The &#8220;Oprah&#8221;fication of Medicine</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2008/05/18/snake-oil-science-the-truth-about-complementary-and-alternative-medicine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/audio/SHC/08/080518-Snake-Oil-Science.mp3" length="1" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>0:00:01</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Every year millions of people flock to  complementary and alternative therapists offering a vast array of treatments  ranging from acupuncture to biofeedback to urine injections. Millions more  purchase over-the-counter alternative medications, such[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Every year millions of people flock to  complementary and alternative therapists offering a vast array of treatments  ranging from acupuncture to biofeedback to urine injections. Millions more  purchase over-the-counter alternative medications, such as glucosamine, herbs,  and homeopathic remedies. While consumer motivations for turning to  complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) vary, there is one common element  among them all: a belief in their effectiveness. This belief appears to be  prevalent among all elements of society, from scientists and physicians to  celebrities such as Prince Charles and Oprah Winfrey to clerical workers and  senior citizens.

On Sunday House Call we focus on the scientific  evidence to help us understand whether a treatment claim, be it for medications  or alternative therapies, do what they purport. And if they do, what is the true  mechanism of action behind it?


Barker Bausell, PhD, biostatistician and  author, Senior Research Methodologist in the Office of Research and Professor,  University of Maryland, Baltimore. He was Research Director of a National  Institutes of Health-funded Complimentary and Alternative Medicine Specialized  Research Center.
Author of Snake Oil Science: The Truth about Complementary and Alternative Medicine, the  science of complementary and alternative medicine.


Related articles:
Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Canada: Trends in Use and Public Attitudes, 1997-2006
Risk: The Science and Politics of Fear
The &#8220;Oprah&#8221;fication of Medicine

Related articles:
Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Canada: Trends in Use and Public Attitudes, 1997-2006
Risk: The Science and Politics of Fear
The &#8220;Oprah&#8221;fication of Medicine
</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Pseudoscience</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>bpr@brigittepellerinrobson.com</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Risk: The Science and Politics of Fear</title>
		<link>http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2008/04/20/risk-the-science-and-politics-of-fear/</link>
		<comments>http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2008/04/20/risk-the-science-and-politics-of-fear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 02:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Barry Dworkin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debunking Pseudoscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History of Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Junk Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pseudoscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Media Reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk perception]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/?p=1224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Original broadcast date: April 20, 2008 We are the safest and healthiest human beings who ever lived, and yet irrational fear is growing, with deadly consequences — such as the 1,595 Americans killed when they made the mistake of switching from planes to cars after September 11. In part, this irrationality is caused by those [...]
Related articles:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2007/03/18/our-very-human-risk-perception-process/' rel='bookmark' title='Our very human risk perception process'>Our very human risk perception process</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2009/03/29/bad-science/' rel='bookmark' title='Bad Science'>Bad Science</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2009/03/01/mcnews-health-stories-what-makes-a-good-science-story/' rel='bookmark' title='McHealth News Stories: What makes a good science story?'>McHealth News Stories: What makes a good science story?</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:right;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"></div><p class="a0 s0"><em>Original broadcast date: April 20, 2008</em></p>
<p class="a0 s0">
<p class="a0 s0"><span class="f0"> </span><span class="f0"><em> </em>We are the safest and healthiest human beings  who ever lived, and yet irrational fear is growing, with deadly consequences —  such as the 1,595 Americans killed when they made the mistake of switching from  planes to cars after September 11. In part, this irrationality is caused by  those — politicians, activists, and the media — who promote fear for their own  gain. Culture also matters. But a more fundamental cause is human  psychology.</span></p>
<p>Working with risk science pioneer Paul Slovic, author Dan  Gardner, <span class="f0">author of his new book </span><span class="f0"><em>Risk: The Science and Politics  of Fear,</em></span> sets out to explain in a compulsively readable fashion just what that  statement above means as to how we make decisions and run our lives. We learn  that the brain has not one but two systems to analyze risk. One is primitive,  unconscious, and intuitive. The other is conscious and rational. The two systems  often agree, but occasionally they come to very different conclusions. When that  happens, we can find ourselves worrying about what the statistics tell us is a  trivial threat — terrorism, child abduction, cancer caused by chemical pollution  — or shrugging off serious risks like obesity and  smoking.</p>
<ul>
<li class="a0 s0"><span class="f0">Dan Gardner is a columnist and senior writer  for the </span><span class="f0"><em>Ottawa Citizen</em></span><span class="f0">,  specializing in criminal justice and other investigative issues. Trained in  history and law, Gardner worked as a senior policy adviser to the premier and  the minister of education before turning to journalism in 1997. His writing has  received numerous awards, including the National Newspaper Award, Amnesty  International’s Media Award, and others.<br />
</span></li>
</ul>
<p></p>
<p>Related articles:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2007/03/18/our-very-human-risk-perception-process/' rel='bookmark' title='Our very human risk perception process'>Our very human risk perception process</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2009/03/29/bad-science/' rel='bookmark' title='Bad Science'>Bad Science</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2009/03/01/mcnews-health-stories-what-makes-a-good-science-story/' rel='bookmark' title='McHealth News Stories: What makes a good science story?'>McHealth News Stories: What makes a good science story?</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/2008/04/20/risk-the-science-and-politics-of-fear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://www.drbarrydworkin.com/audio/SHC/08/080420-Dan-Gardner-Part-1.mp3" length="1" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>0:00:01</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Original broadcast date: April 20, 2008

  We are the safest and healthiest human beings  who ever lived, and yet irrational fear is growing, with deadly consequences —  such as the 1,595 Americans killed when they made the mistake of switching from[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Original broadcast date: April 20, 2008

  We are the safest and healthiest human beings  who ever lived, and yet irrational fear is growing, with deadly consequences —  such as the 1,595 Americans killed when they made the mistake of switching from  planes to cars after September 11. In part, this irrationality is caused by  those — politicians, activists, and the media — who promote fear for their own  gain. Culture also matters. But a more fundamental cause is human  psychology.
Working with risk science pioneer Paul Slovic, author Dan  Gardner, author of his new book Risk: The Science and Politics  of Fear, sets out to explain in a compulsively readable fashion just what that  statement above means as to how we make decisions and run our lives. We learn  that the brain has not one but two systems to analyze risk. One is primitive,  unconscious, and intuitive. The other is conscious and rational. The two systems  often agree, but occasionally they come to very different conclusions. When that  happens, we can find ourselves worrying about what the statistics tell us is a  trivial threat — terrorism, child abduction, cancer caused by chemical pollution  — or shrugging off serious risks like obesity and  smoking.

Dan Gardner is a columnist and senior writer  for the Ottawa Citizen,  specializing in criminal justice and other investigative issues. Trained in  history and law, Gardner worked as a senior policy adviser to the premier and  the minister of education before turning to journalism in 1997. His writing has  received numerous awards, including the National Newspaper Award, Amnesty  International’s Media Award, and others.



Related articles:
Our very human risk perception process
Bad Science
McHealth News Stories: What makes a good science story?

Related articles:
Our very human risk perception process
Bad Science
McHealth News Stories: What makes a good science story?
</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>Pseudoscience, Psychology, Science</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>bpr@brigittepellerinrobson.com</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

